Roethlisberger has never been considered for that award. Roethlisberger is a Hall of Fame quarterback, but he cannot do the same things physically that Rodgers can. If the playoffs are all that matter, Roethlisberger is ahead of Rodgers.īut if statistics and the eye test matter at all, Rodgers is simply in a different class. Rodgers has only one ring and Super Bowl appearance. Roethlisberger has two championships and appeared in a third Super Bowl. If Cowherd's argument is that Brady's championships elevate him away from the rest of history's top quarterbacks, which seems to be the case, then he is being unfair to Roethlisberger by breaking his "championships are all that matters" dictum. But fundamentally speaking, the comparison is unfair to both of them. There certainly are some important commonalities between the two. They were drafted in similar ranges out of similar backgrounds. They are both improvisers, whereas Tom Brady stays within the offense more. Here's who you should compare Aaron Rodgers to: Big Ben." - /VHmvXYtRM1Ĭowherd points out several similarities between the two passers stylistically and statistically. "There's no comparison between Brady and Rodgers. Instead, he would prefer Rodgers to be compared to another quarterback, Ben Roethlisberger. But where he goes off of the rails entirely is in suggesting that the comparison has no merit. In the eyes of Colin Cowherd of Fox Sports 1, the answer is obvious. Are Brady's championships greater than Rodgers' physical ability? Is Tom Brady the greatest quarterback of all time, or is Aaron Rodgers? The arguments are based around what a particularly analyst values. With the New England Patriots and Green Bay Packers squaring off on Sunday Night Football, the entire football world has spent the week debating the merits of the game's two passers.
0 kommentar(er)
